| Saturday, June 20, 2009 |
| AVACADOES AND APRICOTS |
Here's a thought.
'Designer babies' are argued against vehemently, perhaps because it violates the concept of loving your kids unconditionally.
What about reversing it and asking a child if he's comfortable being liked for what he is (his parent's child) rather than for a specific quality with which he was created.
After all, it's considered more acceptable to like a person for being a reclusive genius than for being Einstien's cousin thrice removed, n'est-ce pas? |
posted by Clezevra @ 10:45 AM   |
|
| 2 Comments: |
-
You know, unconditional love is so rare that it's a great safety net. But at times I really want to be liked for WHO I am and not by virtue of my relation with the concerned relatives.
-
hmmm...that's pretty deep. well, unconditional love comes with a condition : you have to be my daughter or son, my blood has to in some perhaps complicated way run through you...
as easy as greasy...(i violated copyright on this one)
|
| |
| << Home |
| |
| |
|
|
| COCKTAIL PUNCH AND A DASH OF SALT |
 - Name: Clezevra
- Location: In Limbo
If knowing oneself is really proof of not knowing oneself this part of the profile is so pointless...
View my complete profile
|
| PAST POSTINGS |
|
| Archives |
|
|
| Now that you're here... |
|
|
| Template By |
|
|
You know, unconditional love is so rare that it's a great safety net. But at times I really want to be liked for WHO I am and not by virtue of my relation with the concerned relatives.